[12.1][LIVE] George Bush - Q Patch Proof - Analyzing Common Anti-Q Arguments

from Destroying the Illusion

Topics

McCain

@00:10:40 bush was mccain mccain being the
@00:10:59 mccain they said passed away from brain
@00:11:03 tribunal mccain could bush have been
@00:11:07 mccain
@00:11:25 think george hw bush was mccain per se i

Trafficking

@00:04:34 involvement in drug trafficking i mean
@00:04:42 things drug trafficking

Comey

@00:06:02 comey tweet from a couple of weeks ago
@00:06:25 and in that comey tweet it was making
@00:06:53 that james comey tweet from november
@00:11:10 got that tweet from comey and it would

Indictments

@00:19:51 sealed indictments so so i mean

Sessions

@00:14:42 who doubted sessions in huber you will
@00:15:09 sessions sessions got fired what do you
@00:15:11 mean trust sessions it's like dude just
@00:15:14 because sessions got fired does it mean
@00:15:19 sessions did his job as ag that he was
@00:15:32 all sorts of things sessions signed off
@00:15:40 we had sessions did his job and then the
@00:15:45 point came where sessions as ag was no
@00:17:14 something to make note of sessions did

Deep state

@00:03:18 course the deep state it's a it's a
@00:03:57 intriguing there you know tesla the deep
@00:04:00 state knew they knew what he was working
@00:06:59 message from the deep state talking
@00:10:31 news the deep state was holding on they
@00:10:44 colloquialism weakened term a deep state
@00:11:31 deep state was waiting for the perfect
@00:16:37 generalization that the deep state is
@00:34:44 farmers the elite the deep state they

Twitter

@00:01:08 passing unfortunately taking to twitter
@00:05:55 he's prolific on twitter jo is great on
@00:05:58 twitter and he was noticing that james
@00:08:22 mike pence's twitter yesterday a
@00:08:59 released on the vice-president's twitter
@00:26:40 how many people have started twitter

Pedophile

@00:04:45 blackmail rings especially pedophile sex

Huber

@00:14:42 who doubted sessions in huber you will
@00:15:27 installed huber huber then worked with

Proof

@00:11:56 another another proof man i mean i don't